SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (33182)12/19/1998 4:15:00 PM
From: paul feldman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Buchannan has been,is and will always be a moron !!!!!!



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (33182)12/19/1998 7:42:00 PM
From: Jacques Tootight  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Pat is as conservative as any of you yet opposes our Iraq policy.

George, I'd be interested to know how you came to the notion that conservatives agree with this Iraqi policy. The policy as it exists is flawed and serves no purpose. It's Clinton's policy. The conservatives I know don't like the policy because it does punish the wrong people. Embargoes don't work. Starving people, hoping that a tyrant will eventually feel terrible enough to give himself up is not conservative thinking. This policy doesn't have an end game and thus it is doomed for failure.

Look, regardless of what any of us think, the decision was made that Saddam was an extremely dangerous person. Once that was put in place the only successful policy had to be one that removed him. Remove him to be tried in a court of law for his crimes, or failing that, let him simply disappear from the face of the earth. The only way to remove an individual is to go and get him. Anyone with any military training, indeed anyone who simply thinks about it, knows that you can't get an individual by tossing hundreds of thousands of pounds of iron from an airplane. You've got to get on the ground and go get him. Now that's where Clinton and the liberals don't have the courage or stomach to go. That's the problem with todays feelgoodism. You can't scare the madmen of the world with our big nasty weapons, they don't care about their people. So when you start a game like the one Clinton started you'd damn well better be prepared to see it to the end. This is a failed policy, and just another example of this administration talking tough and then hoping the bullies will decide to play nice. This president's foreign policy is a sad. He can't take a poll, so he can't make a decision.

There's nothing at all "conservative" about this policy. The hawks on this board you're so mad at simply understand that "the game" that's currently being played can only end in one of two ways. Finish the job, and that means getting bloody, or walk away. Now we all know President Pantywaist doesn't have the brass ones to get bloody, and he's too arrogant to admit his policy is wrong. so he'd rather keep up this stupid embargo and torture innocent people. There's real leadership for you.

Merry Christmas -

RC