SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (6119)12/19/1998 4:30:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
Zeev: My reading is the preferred shares can be converted at the lower of the variable or fixed rate come July 27, or the fixed rate before July 27.

As far as the warrants go, my reading is the terms of the warrant haven't changed, i.e. the warrants (about 400,000 if I recall correctly) may be purchased at Castle Creek's option at a fixed price (I think the fixed price for warrants is about $5?). Of course, if these warrants are exercised, this will provide more cash to VLNC.

So I don't see the floorless scenario applying to the warrants, only the conversion of preferred shares to common, and then not until July 27.

I agree that $100 is years away for this stock, if ever. But I also agree a 2-3 bagger from here over the course of the next year is not out of the question.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (6119)12/19/1998 5:15:00 PM
From: jcox  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
Hi Zeev and All
I read this another way.

"The terms of the preferred stock to be issued in the second half of the financing are similar to the terms negotiated with Castle Creek for the first half of the financing, with minor technical amendments, including that the variable conversion price for the second half of the financing will not be applicable until the end of July, 1999.

To me this says that only the change of date of the variable is
being done but all the same "material order" conditions still
apply. Why would "minor technical amendments" mean the removal
of conditions for a fixed rate conversion.
Also I don't think the warrants would be variable but just that
they would be numbered by taking the second round of financing
2.5M convertible shares and dividing by the price of 6.03.
Does anyone else see it this way or should I take off these
rose colored glasses
Also would anyone care to post what the best case dilution
would be.
John