SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : IT CAME FROM OUTER SPACE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Pueblo who wrote (107)12/20/1998 6:01:00 PM
From: kinkblot  Respond to of 480
 
Joke, maybesamething--beatsme.
Yesterday, toastedvoteresults. Overdiditperhaps.

Somethingofgravity, mayhelpwithfloating. Nextpost.



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (107)12/20/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: kinkblot  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 480
 
The Bernard Haisch zero-point field page:

jse.com

Excerpt, article Beyond E=mc^2 [The Sciences, Nov/Dec 1994]:

Our work suggests that the conventional Newtonian idea of mass must be boldly reinterpreted. If we are correct, physical theory need no longer suppose that there is something called mass having an innate property, inertia, that resists acceleration; what is really happening, instead, is that an electromagnetic force acts on the charge inside matter to create the effect of inertia. Indeed, it appears that the more parsimonious interpretation is not even that there is charge lurking "inside matter," but that there is only charge. The presence of charge and its interaction with the ZPF creates the forces we all experience and attribute to the existence of matter. Our interpretation would apply even to an electrically neutral particle such as the neutron, because the neutron, at the most fundamental level, is thought to be made up of smaller particles called quarks, which do carry electric charge.
.............................................................................

It'slikeadrag, man. Inertiafromzeropoint? Hal'sonthisone, too.