SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (22974)12/19/1998 9:29:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
THE SECRET POLICE STRIKE AGAIN

By DICK MORRIS

CAN anyone seriously believe that the ''outing'' of incoming
House Speaker Robert Livingston's extra-marital affairs is not
the work of the White House Secret Police?

Consider the record. House Oversight Committee Chairman
Dan Burton investigated the White House misuse of FBI files.
Then, out came evidence that he had fathered an
out-of-wedlock child. House Judiciary Committee Chairman
Henry Hyde led the impeachment inquiry against the president.
Then, out came the story of his decades-past adulterous
relationship. Now, Livingston, who has refused to agree to a
censure vote, has found his private life investigated.

Coincidence? Maybe, but add to this the fact that during the
same time period there have been no revelations about the
private lives of any supporter of the president. The contrast is
jarring. And this administration's history of smearing its
enemies, combined with information about administration
knowledge of these stories, leads to the inescapable
conclusion that the White House was responsible for all of
these leaks.

Last night, after the Livingston story broke, ABC's Cokie
Roberts reported that several weeks ago she had been told by
a source close to the White House of a rumor about a
Livingston affair. The White House attacked Roberts for the
story, but she stood by her report. So, how did the Livingston
information get to a source close to the White House?

Matt Drudge, whose passion for scandal has only been
matched by his uncanny accuracy, reported yesterday that a
White House employee, with ties to both the president and the
First Lady, had ''shopped'' the Hyde story before it was
published. Specifically, Drudge reports that this administration
employee called Linda Douglas at ABC News to give her the
details of the Hyde affair. Again, how did a White House
employee get this information and why was a federal employee
out to discredit a member of Congress?

The White House Secret Police - the private eyes deployed by
the Clintons and their agents to dig up dirt to discredit those
who get in the president's way - have performed numerous
damage-control operations since the 1992 election. Delving
into the sexual pasts of the president's adversaries has been a
large part of their modus operandi (as is sifting through other
people's garbage). Accountable to no one, these operatives
work under the supervision of the president's attorneys - David
Kendall and Bob Bennett. Their missions are secret, their
compensation is hidden and the sources of the payments are
obscured.

As Sen.-elect Chuck Schumer said in his speech on
impeachment yesterday, both parties are participating in the
degrading of our politics. It began when filibusters became
automatic in the Senate, and the need to get 60 votes to cut off
debate became routine for passage of virtually any legislation.
When confirmations of Supreme Court justices, Cabinet
members, and even U.S. ambassadors became forums for
partisan conflict, the trend away from moderation and
conciliation continued. But the GOP abuse of the impeachment
process and the White House secret police tactics have each
knocked our political process down yet another notch.

Each time the Secret Police strike, they use a journalistic front
to publish the results of the invasions of the privacy of the
Clintons' perceived enemies. On some occasions, the actual
raw reports of the Secret Police have been provided to friendly
editors. Salon magazine, an administration mouthpiece,
published the Hyde material. And the relationship between the
White House and the supermarket tabloids is surprisingly
intimate. The president's unsmiling lawyer, David Kendall, is
also counsel to the National Enquirer. Terry Lenzner, one of the
favored private eyes who looked into Monica Lewinsky's past,
has also worked for the Enquirer. So, it was not a surprise that
the paper ran a story trashing Monica right before her
grand-jury testimony.

The pattern is altogether too clear - the White House Secret
Police have been here. It's time they are stopped.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (22974)12/19/1998 9:36:00 PM
From: Axxel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
House Republicans have just hired an "outplacement" agency to help themselves find good jobs in 2000. It's the least we can do after they fell for this left-wing trap. I have to say Clinton did a great job in setting finding just the right size noose.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (22974)12/19/1998 9:49:00 PM
From: JBL  Respond to of 67261
 
<Clinton had the privilege of being the first to be harassed by civil litigation funded by very rich political opponents. But who knows,
maybe all future Presidents will have that privilege.>

Daniel :

I am certainly concerned about the frightening aspects of invasion of privacy, but on the other hand, there will be positive aspects to people with too many skeletons in their closet being discouraged to run for office.

For example, I'm not interested in having a Bush son run for the Presidency just based on the prestige attached to his last name. If he feels his past can't stand up to scrutiny, then he should not run.

Clinton's impeachment is destructive, but IMO, essential. I know most people disagree with this.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (22974)12/20/1998 9:51:00 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 67261
 
Still having trouble distinguishing between campaign promises and puffery and perjury I see. Not surprising since you really want nothing other than to see Bubba get a light slap on the wrist and be free to continue sullying the office of the President for an additional two years. Facts and consequences don't matter to you. They are to be manipulated to reach your goal, something you appear to have learned well from your hero, Bubba. As for the "out of the loop", Walsh thoroughly investigated and did not prefer charges. Bush may not be "innocent" but he was not found guilty and more relevant to the current circumstances, he did not admit he lied and misled the American people. JLA