SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (23219)12/20/1998 2:13:00 PM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 67261
 
re: congress voting by polls

It was set up by the framers of the Constitution that the House of Representatives would reflect the will of the people. That is why they were directly elected from the beginning and must all stand for re-election after each session. The House is supposed to vote via the polls of the people (instead of the dollars of the special interests which is what it has become today).

The Senate has different rules and traditions. It is not their role to check the wind before each vote.

TP



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (23219)12/20/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: aknahow  Respond to of 67261
 
What you say is probably true, but I think, that in the case of Clinton, while some of the Republicans may also claim they were looking at the big picture in choosing to ignore the majority of the public. So, once a case is made for respecting the will of the people you should not undermine it by pointing out that doing so can, probably mainly in California, lead to weird unexpected results.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (23219)12/20/1998 6:39:00 PM
From: Bob Lao-Tse  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
>> you need representatives vs. a popular vote because the electorate tends to vote selfishly for their own interests without looking at the big picture.

Exactly why opinion polls should not influence impeachment proceedings.