Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rodster397 who wrote (234)	12/20/1998 3:23:00 PM
From: Jonathan Cleveland	Respond to of 2390

get a life

To: rodster397 who wrote (234)	12/20/1998 5:30:00 PM
From: Wayners	Respond to of 2390

You mean he never should have HAD the sexual encounters to begin with. No conspiracy in the world could make him behave the way he did. What I don't understand is why is everybody so wrapped up with Clinton. Doesn't anybody have any faith in Al Gore to do an equally credible job?

To: rodster397 who wrote (234)	12/20/1998 6:17:00 PM
From: Wren	Respond to of 2390

Clinton had to testify because of what he did to Jennifer Flowers. Then he lied in the Flowers case. Then he lied to the grand jury. What a tangled web. In our state in the past 10 or 15 years, two public officials have been prosecuted for lying to a grand jury. One was a Federal judge who was impeached, and then found guilty by the Senate. No proof. Just his word against his accusers. He lost his judgeship and his $130,000 a year pension. The other was a sheriff. He was tried in Federal Court and is now serving time in the Federal pen. Why do people say Clinton should be above the law when others who have committed perjury have paid big time.