Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rodster397 who wrote (244)	12/20/1998 6:37:00 PM
From: The Street	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2390

<<Why was Bush not investigated for lying to the american citizens.<< Because he was not under oath or was there a Grand Jury convened. Scary, naive posts here...

To: rodster397 who wrote (244)	12/20/1998 7:34:00 PM
From: uu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2390

I wonder what would happen if they let a zealous prosecutor like Kenn Starr with a blank check loose on all republican members of the congress investigating into their private sexual lives. And then have them to tell the truth and nothing but the truth in front of a grand jury. Now that would be a really interesting situation to watch and to listen.

To: rodster397 who wrote (244)	12/20/1998 11:51:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Respond to of 2390

"There was an earlier post regarding Bush. Which really made sense. He went on national television and stated. "Read My Lips No more Taxes" and then turned around and handed the voters a tax increase. Why was Bush not investigated for lying to the american citizens." Hmm, are you trying to say that Bush had already raised taxes when he said that, and was therefore lying? Or are you claiming that you can prove that he had the specific intention of raising taxes when he said that? Of course if he were Clinton, he'd say "It's wasn't a lie, we just raised the old taxes". Barb