Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (23366)	12/20/1998 10:04:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Why is it you and Bateman always show up at the same time? I conclude you are the same individual.

To: Bill who wrote (23366)	12/20/1998 10:17:00 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 67261

The CIC wields vast power. It would be naive to believe he couldn't engineer these events as a scheme. Okay, for the sake of argument lets say these are a scheme. Every time (or even some of the time) that Clinton thinks he is going to be in trouble and wants to divert the press he launches some kind of mini-war. -- I'll be charitable, let's just say it happened once. How would such an attack take place? Does Clinton have a stash of missles in his closet?. No I don't think so. He would have to call upon the established military, state department, CIA, security council and most likely members of the Armed Services Commitees of both houses of congress. Okay, he says, It's important -- we got to act - I can't explain it now because time is short so launch those missles. Now the next day we have the generals showing pictures of buildings they just bombed, the members of the state department talking about the diplomatic overatures, the Prime Minister of England talking about his role. Don't you think if they had doubts about the mission, about it's timing that they would say so, or appear reticent. Don't you think they would resign in mass if confronted with such an order? You are attempting to claim that these people are all either in collusion with Clinton or that once duped they are too ashamed to admit that they fell for the prank. I DON'T THINK SO TP