SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rose Rose who wrote (270)12/20/1998 10:36:00 PM
From: Frank Griffin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2390
 
When you put forth that Clinton is being abused because he is being prosecuted for lying under oath and obstructing justice then you are definitely tacitly endorsing dishonesty. Is he the best you have to offer? Do you either work for the government or do you receive something from the government?

Thanks, Frank



To: Rose Rose who wrote (270)12/20/1998 10:38:00 PM
From: RavenCrazy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2390
 
Said by Rose's little girl about the cost of the investigation:

>>"Why aren't they using that money to help the homeless?" (she worries about the homeless because here in L.A., we see them on every corner)>>

Why ROSE! At nine years old, your daughter is already a commie! Decent, law-abiding, God-fearing people don't think people's hard-earned money should go to social causes, not when it can be used for purposes like dirt-digging. Those people are probably sinners and deserve just what they get. You need to have a talk with that young lady FAST!




To: Rose Rose who wrote (270)12/20/1998 10:38:00 PM
From: rodster397  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2390
 
I must agree with Rose....no one has agreed with lieing under oath. What I belieive is Clinton should have never been under oath to begin with.

Rodster