Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (27200)	12/21/1998 4:51:00 PM
From: Emile Vidrine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

After 8 years of detailed inspection of the remotest sites that have been suspected of producing these weapons, nothing significant was found. Then our government uses our weapons of mass destruction for 3 days to obliterate much of Iraq --to wipe out any trace of possible or potential sites for weapons of mass destruction. Has any reliable source spelled out what sites were destroyed? There seems to be a lot of eliminating --but of what? The US has the greatest cache of nuclear and biological weapons in the world, and they are the only country that has proven that they will use them on civilians---Nagasake and Hiroshima! The bombing of Iraq pulls a few hundred millions of dollars for the US taxpayers pockets and maintains and secures nuclear and biological dominance of the experimental Jewish fundamentalist theocracy in the Middle East. Emile

To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (27200)	12/24/1998 6:43:00 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 108807

Merry Christmas, Freddy Teddy!!! I guess we will just have to disagree on the Council of Nicea. Even though you are wrong, wrong, wrong, it is not really very much fun for me if you refuse to admit it. So, in the spirit of holiday bliss and, in my case, the cup of steaming mulled mead that I am drinking, what do you think of the situation with Clinton and the Senate? For those of you who are not following this very closely (more Americans watched football than the impeachment vote last Saturday on television), some of Clinton's operatives seem to be arguing that he tough it out, daring the Senate to just TRY and do anything at all to him, while he refuses to acknowledge that he lied under oath. His hope with this strategy is that he will end up neither censured or convicted, or anything else except totally vindicated. This is vintage Clinton. I hope he overplays his hand and is soundly routed, or Roto-Rootered or something. I also thought it interesting that respected journalist Cokie Roberts says that the White House was spreading the Livingston story a couple of weeks before it came out, and that Sidney Blumenthal (Sid Vicious to the rest of the working press) may have been involved. I hope at least that everyone knows Larry Flynt is just another Clinton dirty tricks guy. I think one of the primary reasons that people who read newsmagazines, watch talking heads shows, or are members of the press are further out there with an understanding of how bad a guy Clinton is, is that they have heard all the stories about how corrupt this administration really is.