Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank Griffin who wrote (293)	12/21/1998 1:06:00 AM
From: Anthony@Pacific	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2390

Lets just call a spade a spade..Clintons a liar, a perjurer, a deceptive backstabbing scum bag, an obstructer of justice, a felonious maggot and now he is a murderer..Lets see we bombed the hell out of a country,destroyed their economy , placed sanctions that cause thousands of childeren under the ages of 10 to die every year..then we bomb themagain after 7 years of living hell.. Where are the biological weaopons, the Germ bombs,,where are the leaks into the atmosphere of the toxic gas that is there?/ should nt we see signs of that since our mission was a "success"? Our president is a coward and a self-preserving idiot who betrayed every family in America that holds truth, justice and fidelity as high values and dear standards by which Americans can live with.. Dont bother responding to me or trying to express your opinions to me..i do not care nor will I respond. I just wanted to get it off my chest that I for one think he should be tried as a war criminal.

To: Frank Griffin who wrote (293)	12/21/1998 8:58:00 AM
From: Rose Rose	Respond to of 2390

>>I just bumfuzzled that you and a lot of people like you completely ignore that he lied under oath and that he attempted to obstruct justice.<< I have asked repeatedly for direct quotes to back up your claims, and you continue to post your wild assumptions without a single word to back up your position. When I posted that Clinton should be censured, did you think I meant he should be censured for some OTHER reason? When I posted that Clinton should be put on trial for his alleged crimes after he has left office, did you just conveniently skip over that passage, or did you decide to ignore it because it didn't fit in with your running theme that "all liberals endorse perjury"? You seem hellbent on repeating the same statements again and again, despite multiple posts challenging those statements. Really fits in with the marching cattle image, doesn't it? >>In about 12 years you might just be thrilled to death to have your daughter accepted as an intern in the white house. Shouldn't you be able to have confidence that a very high ranking 50 year old won't be attempting to seduce her? << So Monica was just an innocent little victim, eh? The poor girl was just too young and stupid to make her own decisions? Do you have any idea how insulting your attitude is to women everywhere? And why should I worry whether at some distant time, some 50-year-old might try to seduce my daughter (or whether my daughter might try to seduce some 50-year-old)? In the first place, this possibility would exist even if there had never been a Clinton. In the second place, worrying about such a thing would be a grave insult to my daughter; just as I would have been insulted had my mother ever worried about the same with me. In my family, we trust each other and we instill strong moral and ethical values in our children while they are quite young. Guess that's the difference between my family and yours. Rose