SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: alan w who wrote (23482)12/21/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 67261
 
but wasn't there something in there ....

This is what is going to make a Senate proceeding so entertaining. Was it sex, or just fooling around? Was she aroused? Was it as good for her as it was for him? Did they kiss, or touch? Was he backing away or holding her head?

This is going to be delightful. And on TV too. With periodic updates by Larry Flynt. Yes this is what the Radicals think is more important than Social Security, the economy, or having any input about Saddam.
TP



To: alan w who wrote (23482)12/21/1998 12:59:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Yeah, maybe there was something. And we'll have the Senate debating the meaning of "aroused" over the next 6 months!




To: alan w who wrote (23482)12/21/1998 2:01:00 PM
From: RJC2006  Respond to of 67261
 
<<<Maybe my memory is faulty, but wasn't there something in there about the gratification of any person?>>>

Way to go. Confuse 'em with facts.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News