Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (23490)	12/21/1998 11:33:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Wow, bp. Quite an intellectual coup here, jumping on some confusion between James Watt and JC Watts. I think James Watt is an appropriate name to bring in here. We should clearcut everything we can now, there may not be a next generation. The millennium draws near. Nobody gets out of here alive. Or, if you believe certain Republican analysts, it'll all be forgotten about in a month. Who can say?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (23490)	12/21/1998 11:39:00 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

J.C. Watts: The football star-turned-congressman R-Okla No I don't know the name of every congressman. More important I am not here to impress you with my "educated opinions". I would like for you to think your own positions through. There is way too much rhetoric that is without substance. If there is one thing I am trying to do, it is to challenge you and others to look at the big picture, not the slogans, and to place this debate in it's proper context. TP