Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sharon J. Jones who wrote (316)	12/21/1998 12:08:00 PM
From: Frank Griffin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2390

Now you are giving the Republicans Larry Flynt. He has worked so diligently for the democratic party to find dirt. I believe he offered a 1 million reward for dirt on Republicans. Why would he ever leave the party that shares his views on pornography, etc.. How could your brother leave a party that wants to give more freedom to the American people. Has he decided he likes big, centralized government with high taxes? Does he like government waste? Does he believe that Clinton and his like know better how to run his life than he does? I just can't comprehend how any fine American, especially one who served his country honorably, could endorse a party with the values and ethics of the democratic party. Best wishes, Frank

To: Sharon J. Jones who wrote (316)	12/21/1998 12:31:00 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2390

<<<that neo nazi Delay>>> I'm not sure how you came to this opinion. It seems to overstep the boundary of good taste. It, however does raise this question: What does it say about the Democrats working diligently with Mr. Flynt in digging up info on the republicans. Does that make the democrats child molesters as he is? I don't think so but based on your logic it would. Just food for thought. <<<self righteous rightwingers applaud their own philanderers >>> To applaud this is wrong and Livingston has done the right thing by stepping down. However, the way you interpret the whole situation is also wrong. Clinton lied under oath. This is about perjury not sex. To cheat on your spouse is unacceptable no matter what your part affiliation. To lie under oath is illegal and against the law.