Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (358)	12/21/1998 1:35:00 PM
From: R. Martenson	Respond to of 2390

"found this remark unnecessary and unfortunate" I agree, and back to topic...in the punishment phase of the President, where do we find the 'middle' ground. Personally, I am probably far more conservative than my moderate rhetoric, but if I had all the answers we wouldn't be having this debate. As I have said in some of my recent posts, I think the President is criminal. Now that depends ( using Clinton speak) how you define criminal. In a pluralistic society how do we satisfy honest disagreement on the criminality of the leader, when most voters aren't lawyers or constitutional scholars. (And some of us can't even use the English language properly, as one of my critics just pointed out).

To: The Philosopher who wrote (358)	12/21/1998 3:19:00 PM
From: Rose Rose	Respond to of 2390

Christopher, thank you for the call to reason. I myself have flamed many people in the last few days, and no doubt will continue to do so; I offer no apology for having done so because in my opinion the people I've flamed deserved it. But you deserve kudos for your efforts, and I'd happily carry on a flameless debate with you. :) Rose (hey, you have to flame some people, because they're INCAPABLE of debating)