SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Stock Market Bubble -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Terry Whitman who wrote (2436)12/21/1998 2:17:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3339
 
Considering that the next Clinton crisis is early January, one could probably expect another manufactured crisis shortly after the first week of January.



To: Terry Whitman who wrote (2436)12/21/1998 7:40:00 PM
From: John Pitera  Respond to of 3339
 
Terry, Your Thdmapfp, is a great observation, I remember Mark Haines,
pointing out the same type of % differential of the Djia over its
200 day MA in the summer of 1997 and then we saw weakness into the
end of Aug and then into oct 27th 1997.

Thanks for pointing it out,

John



To: Terry Whitman who wrote (2436)12/21/1998 8:19:00 PM
From: Moominoid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3339
 
I gave up yesterday..... all cash in US as of now. No idea what is happening..... Especially with AMG data negative. Still long Australia (though lots of cash there too).

David



To: Terry Whitman who wrote (2436)12/22/1998 8:15:00 AM
From: Wren  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3339
 
Terry, to be sure I am following you, please clarify the calculation of "almost 18%". The numbers you show are 1812 on 200 day average, and 2037 on Nasdaq. 2037 divided by 1812 = 1.124 (up over 12%)

The Nasdaq close was 2138. 2138 divided by 1812 = 1.1799 (up almost 18%)

Is the 2037 number a typo? Or do I just not understand?