SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sharon J. Jones who wrote (408)12/21/1998 4:57:00 PM
From: R. Martenson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2390
 
"poor fools" "morons" "loonies", come on Sharon, you are
a lawyer, Clinton is already giving lawyers a bad name
for character assassinations. Give us intellectually
challenged voters with a contrary view a fighting chance.

I don't think we can take anymore insults or we might have
to switch parties.



To: Sharon J. Jones who wrote (408)12/21/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: Augustus Gloop  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2390
 
<<<far right religious loonies>>>

This is not a religious argument. Its about Law.



To: Sharon J. Jones who wrote (408)12/21/1998 5:07:00 PM
From: Shoot1st  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2390
 
The only thing you could have gotten out of the 60's was puberty.

It really must have left a profound "anti-establishment" mark on your life......I see you have stood firm.

Shoot1st



To: Sharon J. Jones who wrote (408)12/21/1998 5:13:00 PM
From: Wren  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2390
 
Sharon, "your man" has acted like a moron in this matter.

He knew that the Jones lawyers would be seeking other women that had had experiences with him. That is the only thing a lawyer can do in a she said - he said matter. And there were apparently a lot of corroborating witnesses (Arkansas state troopers and unknown number of women)

Only he knew how exposed to potential women witnesses he was. But he chose not to settle with Jones (and he could have apparently done it with only an apology at one time. He might have simply said something like, "I have already said that I did some things in the past that caused pain to my family, and I am truly sorry about that. I don't specifically remember Ms. Jones, but it is possible that I did something that offended her, and because of that possibility, I apologize.")

If he had settled Jones early on, none of the rest would have happened.

Why do you think he was so hardheaded?



To: Sharon J. Jones who wrote (408)12/21/1998 5:30:00 PM
From: Augustus Gloop  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2390
 
<<<<All his facts come out of white supremacist publications>>>

If that is correct and he is a white supremacist then he is wrong.

<<<<Israel is another nation going down the tubes for pandering to the far right religious loonies>>>

To demagogue a culture is also wrong. Are you an anti-Semite?