SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RJC2006 who wrote (23674)12/21/1998 5:20:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 67261
 
There shall be no "deal" before trial:

Monday December 21 4:22 PM ET

Sen. Byrd Against Any 'Deal' With White House

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic senator widely respected by both parties for
extensive knowledge on Senate history and procedures, said Monday there must be no
''deal'' involving the White House in any impeachment proceedings.

''To a very large degree, we are now navigating in previously unchartered waters, but one thing is clear: For the good of our nation, there must be no 'deal' involving the White House or any entity beyond the current membership of the U.S. Senate,'' Sen. Robert
Byrd of West Virginia said in a statement.

''Whether there is a trial or whether there is some other solution, that decision must be made by senators, and it must be bipartisan or it will have absolutely no credibility with the public,'' Byrd said.

Since the House impeached President Clinton Saturday, senators from both parties have pointed to Byrd's opinion as one to follow.

Senate leaders have said proceedings toward a trial on the two impeachment articles charging Clinton with perjury and obstruction of justice were likely to start early in the new year after the new Congress convenes.

Byrd advised senators to ''go home, take the telephone off the hook, stop speculating, and focus instead on the true spirit and meaning of this Holy Season of Christmas.''
dailynews.yahoo.com.

And so it was said, so it shall be done.




To: RJC2006 who wrote (23674)12/21/1998 6:43:00 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 67261
 
""<<But, as someone might phrase it, not a substantive use of his missile units.>>>
Well, with Mr. Klinton no one knows for sure what this means.""

Did you miss substantive and units? It's not a post from Klinton.