Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sharon J. Jones who wrote (467)	12/21/1998 6:19:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 2390

Anyhow it's all left up to interpretation and your political beliefs. Precisely. Which is what's sad. Truth, honor, integrity, none of them come close to politics in this Congress. On BOTH sides of the aisle. Sad.

To: Sharon J. Jones who wrote (467)	12/21/1998 6:29:00 PM
From: R. Martenson	Respond to of 2390

I suggest you both are thinking like lawyers and not like voters ( i.e. us common folk ). Democratic constituents support scandal politicians involved in sex and drugs BECAUSE they fear the predictable judgement ingrained in some of the Republican right wing. Republican's support scandal politicians involved in money schemes because they fear the socialist spending habits of the left wing of the Democrats. If you take the legaleeze out of the debate and speak to the squishy emotional debate, which is the basis of the majority of voters, there is common ground. If we can kill the prejudged fear factor on both sides, admit the predispositions based on historical fact, we might once again listen to the voices of statesman, and maybe even create a more just application of the law.