SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ish who wrote (23745)12/21/1998 7:33:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Ish, you may take your sanctimonious pronouncement and CC it in a PM to your unit buddies. You guys are so proud of your tag team taunting, but when anything comes back, it's a moral disgrace. Tough. You want to debate something in a civil manner, fine. I haven't noticed much desire to do that from you, JLA, or Billy Boy. You can add K into that bunch too.

As for the pissing units, this forum seemed to be already well established as an insult pissing match before I ever arrived here. "Partisan hatred" is all fine and good as long as it's directed at the one correct target, Bill Clinton, who's to blame for everything that's gone wrong with the world since the '60s. Again, anything goes the other way, that's something else entirely.

So, go ahead, Ish, send some more PMs to your unit buddies, see if you can round up support for your preferred solution of making past military service a requirement for voting. It'll be a tough fight, getting that Constitutional amendment passed, but with your inarguably correct position, I'm sure all the idiot voters will come around. Just tell them what whores they all are.



To: Ish who wrote (23745)12/21/1998 7:53:00 PM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)  Respond to of 67261
 
ISH...how come you are now an activist...have relatives over and trying to impress them....best to tone down your attacks and let nature take its course as Republicans lose more public support.....73 per centum.....haahahahaha



To: Ish who wrote (23745)12/21/1998 10:41:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Don't bother Ish, he's so dense nothing could penetrate. JLA