Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: uu who wrote (528)	12/22/1998 1:59:00 AM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 2390

Then have Starr bring them all in front of a grand jury and ask them the detail questions about their affairs. What do you think thess guys would do? I think they would refuse to testify, which is their perfect right as it was Clinton's. It was his ego and raw arrogance that led him to believe that he could testify and lie and not get caught. None of the others are so stupid. They simply wouldn't testify. If you don't testify, you can't commit perjury!

To: uu who wrote (528)	12/22/1998 1:59:00 AM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2390

Addi make sure and remember to do what you can to defeat Tom Campbell in 2000. He voted for impeachment in a very socially liberal district. He claims that legally he needed to do that but I heard a law professor from Hastings today on NPR that said that was not the case. Also Campbells people accused the WH of coming to get him or some stupid claim like that. Hes been an ok representative as I understand it but this is too much really. Michelle

To: uu who wrote (528)	12/22/1998 2:11:00 AM
From: gmccon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2390

As you suggested, if you gave Ken Star $4 million each for Hyde and Bono, et al, and charged him with finding the same dirt on them as he did on Clinton, you'd first have to find them lying about their sex lives in front of a federal grand jury. Why do you conveniently keep forgetting that fine point?

To: uu who wrote (528)	12/22/1998 3:51:00 PM
From: Frank Griffin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2390

Are you privy to the work that Flynt is doing for the democratic party to dig up dirt? From whence do you get information that Livingston is a scoundrel. I believe he is a sincere and dedicated man who puts his country ahead of his personal goals. I believe, even though he has erred, he has character. I don't believe he has lied under oath nor has he obstructed justice. Where can you get off in attacking him or trying to compare him to a character like Clinton? Clinton has consistently put his personal interests ahead of the countries interest. Do you think for a minute the country would suffer if Clinton were replaced? The country is bigger than him or anyone. It will continue to go forward. However, Clinton wants to be president. Did he want to serve his country in the military? NO! I sincerely believe that if he would have been forced to serve he wouldn't be living in America today. He would have left the country rather than serve. Please don't compare him to Americans who have selflessly served their country wherever needed. Frank