SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ken Salaets who wrote (2991)12/22/1998 2:59:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 9818
 
Egan - F500 update

'From:
Robert Egan <egan263@nospam_allowed.ix.netcom.com>
0:59

Subject:
Fortune 500 - Update at +30 days

A month has eleapsed since the Fortune 500 survey. During that month
some companies have slipped, some have finished early, some have added
dates and a few have removed dates.

For those of you who missed the survey last time around, it deals with
anticipated remediation of internal systems, both IT and embeddeds. It
does not cover testing, which is assumed to continue right up until
12/31/99 for all companies. The data is extracted from the SEC 10K/10Q
disclosure reports available at the yahoo or edgar sites.

The entire list is at flybyday.com
although it will probably not be updated until this weekend. Here is the
summary:

Announcing completion:

#120 May Department Stores
#135 McDonalds
#167 The Limited
#245 Venatar (was Woolworths)
#367 Consolidated Stores

Joining Chevron [will miss 12/31/99]:

#338 Nash Finch
#491 US Office Products

Actually "moved up" their dates:

# 70 AMR 98/12/31 (was 99/03/31)
#251 TransAmerica 99/03/31 (was 99/06/30)
#377 Inacom 99/03/31 (was 99/06/30)

Slipped their dates:

# 4 WalMart 99/03/31 (was 98/12/31)
# 9 Phillip Morris 99/09/30 (was 99/06/30)
# 62 MCI Communications 99/06/30 (was 99/03/31)
# 74 JP Morgan 99/06/30 (was 98/12/31)
# 75 UAL 99/06/30 (was 99/04/30)
# 86 Fleming 99/06/30 (was 99/03/31)
#177 Halliburton 99/09/30 (was 99/06/30)
#197 Humana 99/03/31 (was 98/12/31)
#262 Gateway 2000 99/09/30 (was 99/06/30)

Giving dates for the first time:

# 44 Home Depot 99/06/30
# 51 Walt Disney 99/07/31
# 57 Enron 99/09/30
# 65 American Stores 99/06/30
# 73 American Express 98/12/31
# 78 Bristol-Meyers 99/06/30
# 79 Ingram Micro 99/06/30
# 97 Fluor 98/12/31
# 98 American Home Prod 99/06/30
#103 Viacom 99/06/30
#111 Tosco 99/06/30
#125 Dell Computer 98/12/31
#143 Toys 'R Us 99/03/31
#159 CBS 99/12/31
#178 ITT Industries 99/03/31
#188 Burlington Northern 99/06/30
#189 General Re 98/12/31
#208 TJX 99/06/30
#224 Tech Data 99/11/30
#263 St Paul Companies 99/03/31
#276 AMP 99/03/31
#290 Avnet 99/06/30
#316 Nordstrom 99/03/31
#360 Barnett Banks 99/09/30
#372 Niagra Mohawk 99/12/31
#386 Office Max 99/06/30
#392 Supermarket General 99/08/31
#420 Rich Food Holdings 99/06/30
#476 Longs Drug Stores 99/03/31
#496 Barnes and Noble 99/09/30

Removed their dates [why?]:

#259 Tyson foods (was 98/12/31)
#447 Corporate Express (was 99/01/31)
#472 Westvaco (was 99/06/30)

The rest remained unchanged.

Regards
Robert Egan



To: Ken Salaets who wrote (2991)12/22/1998 3:05:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9818
 
=== Developing Countries in Sad Shape ===
'From:
news53@aol.com (News53)
7:06

Subject:
=== Developing Countries in Sad Shape ===

===================================================

Cutter Consortium's Ed
Yourdon on UN Year 2000
Meeting: Developing Countries
in Sad Shape

ARLINGTON, Mass., Dec. 17 /PRNewswire/ -- The following statement is being
issued by Cutter Consortium:

''Watching the UN Year 2000 meeting, it was sobering to see how many countries
found it necessary to repeatedly appeal for financial assistance and computer
experts to help them with what they euphemistically referred to as a 'late
start' in
their Y2000 efforts. The developing nations, in particular, were repeatedly
urged
to apply to the World Bank for assistance; but to illustrate the dimension of
the
problem, several of the countries needed financial assistance to pay for the
plane
fares to send two of their delegates to the conference!''

These comments are from Cutter Consortium Chairman and Year 2000 Expert Ed
Yourdon. Mr. Yourdon attended the December 11 United Nations meeting, which
focused on year 2000. Delegates from over 120 countries gathered in New York
City to spend a day discussing their respective plans, progress, and concerns
about
the Y2000 problem. Consortium Senior Consultants Howard Rubin and Peter de
Jager were also in attendance. Dr. Rubin prepared the Global Briefing Summary
for the National Coordinators.

Yourdon continues, ''The fact that such a meeting could take place at all, and
that
so many countries attended on relatively short notice, is a remarkable
testament to
the growing significance of the Y2000 problem; as UN Secretary General Kofi
Annan put it in his address, 'tackling the Y2000 bug is the largest and most
complex project undertaken in the history of computing.' Of course, if there
was
to be any realistic hope of repairing most of the world's computers in time,
the
conference should have been held four or five years ago.''

''Why should any of this matter to the typical private-sector, profit- oriented
organization? Primarily because, as Year 2000 Czar John Koskinen pointed out in
his opening speech in the morning, 'one country's problem is a problem for all
of
us.' ''

''The financial and political disruptions in Asia, Russia, and South America
during
the past year have certainly emphasized that point, and it was all the more
obvious
after a day's discussions with these UN delegates that Y2000 will create a
global
ripple effect like nothing we've ever seen before. And that should be
particularly
evident to the multinational companies, which include a hefty portion of the
*Fortune* 500 companies in the US, whose American CIOs are fond of bragging
that their companies are operating in 50 or 100 countries, in which departments
and subsidiaries are connected together via SAP, the Web, EDI, and Microsoft
Mail; and yet these CIOs seem oblivious to the possibility that a serious
national
Y2000 disruption in France or Brazil or Botswana could have a devastating
impact
on their company's profitability.''

===================================================