Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 2000 Date-Change Problem: Scam, Hype, Hoax, Fraud -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom C who wrote (1074)	12/22/1998 6:44:00 PM
From: Cheeky Kid	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1361

Tom, if you post that on the other Y2K threads, people are going to poke it full of holes. Maybe it's a conspiracy? Those lights should have stopped working. What if data is now corrupted from that test? Maybe that test doesn't prove anything. You wait and see, if you post that anywhere else, the brain washed will poke this full of holes!!

To: Tom C who wrote (1074)	12/23/1998 11:12:00 PM
From: David Eddy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1361

Tom C - Montgomery County, MD A pretty strange article. Hard to tell whether Y2K was or was not an issue. Have to get well into the piece to see that they've spent $17 million already. Doesn't give a comparison so we can't tell if that's a lot or a little money. Tone of the article seems to be "gee, we ran the test & nothing happened...see, we told you so." So I'm confused. Was that $17 million just money down the toilet, or what? Not exactly Pulitzer Prize material. If I weren't familiar with Montgomery County's Y2K efforts, I'd be really confused by that Post article. - David