Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sharon J. Jones who wrote (642)	12/22/1998 7:04:00 PM
From: R. Martenson	Respond to of 2390

That is also why we believe in the separation of church and state, and are governed by laws not religion. If you wish to replace legal tests with moral equivalancy, I suggest you call, write, or run for congress. Change the law don't do it by judicial corruption. If it is so important that one individual lead the country at all costs ( of either party) I suggest you also support a change to a Monarchy or Theocracy rather than a representative Democracy. If public opinion polls govern your legal view, than I also suggest many of your clients would be dead ducks. The long and short of the whole discussion is abuse of power thru the abrogation of a finite but numerous number of laws and ethics that make this guy disgusting to many. You may not agree, but if you and I look to the welfare of the body politic in the future...which way do you want to error to go? You are a lawyer, which way do you want the laws to slide? Some times nice guys break the law and sometimes nice guys even go to jail....not often, but sometimes. Got to go home and kick the dog, slay a few Central Americans, and throw my old mother out in the street. She sure pick a bad night to be the mother of a Conservative...it is 20 below out here. Cheers.