SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eski who wrote (3004)12/22/1998 11:31:00 PM
From: J.L. Turner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
Eski,
You're so funny.The very first myth of this article I addressed on post 2971.That post concerned Nuclear Power Plants and the power grid.Guess who that post was to,and guess who didn't respond.
To: Eski (2970 )
From: J.L. Turner
Monday, Dec 21 1998 10:00AM ET
Reply # of 3005

My concerns from this positive article:
1Manager Van dell states in report they can make scheduling changes in
case 2or3 plants go down to y2k,therefore this is official confirmation
that a manager of a nuclear power plant believes
y2k can shut down nuclear power plants.
2 The first NRC inspection of a plant occured Sept. 98 and they were
still checking assessment!
3 Radiation could be accidently released and the NRC wanted to know the
air flow of such radiation.
4: 70% of the software remains to be checked.
5: What about the plants that are not pre chip usage?
6:At least 12 critical systems are not compliant by the plant managers
own words yet the NRC compliments them for moving along according to
schedule???
startribune.com
Those are reasonable questions on facts presented in the minneapolis paper?Of course you wouldn't answer or respond then so I wouldn't expect you to now.It's much easier to label with a name "hype" anyone that doesn't accept your pollyanna extremism than it is to make a factual argument.By the way do you know anything about residual failure?