Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : BNEZ and PMA; Success in 1999 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: otcbbbaby who wrote (969)	12/23/1998 8:46:00 AM
From: Elio Madama	Respond to of 2648

At least PMA seems to been selling very well. Yesterday I went again to CompUSA and three units were sold. PMA is next to Windows on Wall Street (the expensive one at $ 199.00), so PMA look very cheap. That's why maybe is selling so good. I know my son is buying two more today for presents. Elio

To: otcbbbaby who wrote (969)	12/23/1998 5:12:00 PM
From: lakers17	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2648

otcbbbaby........... Two very awesome posts today. You think like I do and I appreciated the in depth analysis of where shares can come from. I still am convinced there isn't a huge naked short position and I've said all along that the same shares can be counted up to four times with the average being 2.5. I would also guess that there are Rule 144 shares out there. The cert recall can't hurt and will test the waters. Windows on Wall Street has done fairly well without advertising and if PMA is advertised it would realty take off. Even with more shares in the float than we suspect BNEZ still has a small float than most BB stocks. If early PMA sales haven't generated enough advertising money I wouldn't mind shares being issued for this purpose. Jack and Mikie are extremely intelligent so I'm sure they have their game plan. The daily price of BNEZ still isn't a concern to me. If it's at this price 3-6 months from now I'll be concerned. Lakers