Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: randmiser who wrote (17169)	12/23/1998 8:27:00 AM
From: Brady B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

I can't remember what he said I accused him of. Don't worry. If he won't send them, we'll get Terry or somebody to. bb

To: randmiser who wrote (17169)	12/23/1998 8:42:00 AM
From: randmiser	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

From jive Brady To, dig dis: Terry, Blue and oda' esq's by, dig dis: Brady_00 (40/M/San Antonio, TX) 11674 of 11675Happy Holidays……… Please accept wid no obligashun, implied o' implicit mah' best wishes fo' an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress, non-addictive, genda' neutral, celebrashun uh de winta' solstice holiday, practiced widin de most enjoyable tradishuns of de religious puh'suasion uh yo' choice, o' secular practices uh yo' choice, wid respect fo' de religious/secular puh'suasions and/o' tradishuns uh oders, o' deir choice not t'practice religious o' secular tradishuns at all... And some fiscally successful, sucka'ally fulfillin', and medically uncomplicated recognishun uh de onset uh de generally accepted calendar year 1999, but not widout due respect fo' de calendars uh choice uh oder cultures whose contribushuns t'society gots helped make America great, (not t'imply dat America be necessarily greata' dan any oda' country o' is de only "AMERICA" in de western hemisphere), and widout regard t'de race, creed, colo', age, physical ability, religious faid, o' sexual preference uh de wishee. (By acceptin' dis greetin', ya' is acceptin' dese terms. Dis greetin' is subject t'clarificashun o' widdrawal. It be freely transferable wid no alterashun t'de o'iginal greetin'. It implies no promise by de wisher to actually implement any uh de wishes fo' her/himself o' oders, and is void where prohibited by law, and be revocable at de sole discreshun of de wisher. Ah be baaad... Dis wish is warranted t'puh'fo'm as 'espected widin de usual applicashun of baaaad tidin's fo' some puh'iod uh one year, o' until de issuance uh a subsequent holiday greetin', whicheva' comes fust, and warranty be limited to replacement uh dis wish o' issuance uh a new wish at de sole discreshun uh de wisher. Ah be baaad...) Gots Happy Holidays and a Happy New Year. Ah be baaad... bb

To: randmiser who wrote (17169)	12/23/1998 12:57:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Randy, you're quite right. My refusal would be unfair to others. But put this in perspective. I've been here for a year, and nearly as long on ESVS/Yahoo. I've posted--who knows?--three to four thousand messages. My postion has remained steadfast and I have been consistent. I've never lied nor intentionally misled anyone. Have I posted before in error? Indeed, I have. Have I corrected my errors when I've done that? Indeed, I have. I've tried to make my posts stimulating in an effort to nudge others into thinking thoughts I may not consider myself, I've taken some minority and controversial postions and I've challenged where I thought appropriate to do so. But there has been nothing in my actions so as to generate a sense of mistrust. My opinion is my opinon; my theory is my theory--is it wrong to share this with others? Of course not! Where my head was at when I agreed to submit the questions was that Brady and I would partner on the project. But the vibrations I got from him weren't anywhere close to partnering. Did he communicate with me via private message on how best to submit the questions? No. Instead he makes a public pronoucement that I might unilaterally delete questions, this after I'd already asked him to edit the questions first before fowarding them to me. Since I would be the one writing the cover letter to accompany those questions, and since those questions would be going in under my name, I would want them to not only good questions but meaningful questions, not a long laundry list of complaints. Were Brady to have submitted too many questions, I would have consulted with him as to which ones best fit our objectives. Point is, he was wrong to imply I would outright dismiss someone's genuine request for information. But you're right. Why should others be deprive of a possibility to gain further information. And, of course, this should be tempered by the fact that I may or may not get answers to the questions and we have by no means any idea of how the timeliness of such answers may be. If you really would like to continue this project, then you compile the questions and then I'll consult with you as to which ones to submit to Pat Hayton. The bottom line is I'm not going to partner on a project with someone who demeans the quality of my effort, as Brady had done. And, further, you have to realize that I'm comfortable with my Zulu investment and, personally, do not see the questions compelling. But since indeed I've had direct contact, perhaps this contact could be helpful to others so I'm willing to try. But I'm not going to try only to get shin-kicked by others. I hope you understand my position. Let me know what you'd like to do.