SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: donkeyman who wrote (3814)12/23/1998 11:24:00 AM
From: waldo  Respond to of 37507
 
Dec 23, 1998

Wrong! Rear Echelon Revelations: Why Net Stocks Ramp and Dead-Tree Publishing Stocks Don't

By James J. Cramer

Not everybody is a winner in the new Net world. In fact, there are some serious losers: television, print, brokers, maybe even banks. There will be a long list of casualties when the Net is finished with its work.

Most of these casualties remain invisible to the naked eye or are under the radar screen. Let's take a look at how the Net is making roadkill of a particular industry -- media -- again as a method of understanding the phenomenal move in these stocks.

The most glaring casualty out there is your local newspaper. Take a look at the siege these companies are experiencing. First, let's look at the typical newspaper's revenue side. The most lucrative single portion of a newspaper is its classifieds. These cost very little to produce, but because of the reach of the paper, they have immense value to readers. Yet, the Net is a much more efficient way to do the classified business. That's what eBay (Nasdaq:EBAY - news) is all about. This business has to be going away in spades for these guys.

Second is display advertising. But we know that the Net retailers are cutting into the budgets of the big display advertisers. (The stocks tell you that.) And big-ticket items, the kind that get the big margins, are better sold on the Net anyway, because the customer avoids the sales tax. (Looming problem there.)

Circulation? Subscription? Forget it. Nobody makes any money from these things. It is a huge expense to sign you up and make sure that the paper gets delivered to you. In fact, the cost side of the delivery is so immense and so variable -- paper, labor, gasoline for trucks -- that it is positively antediluvian vs. the Net.

So what has been the newspaper industry's response to the Net? Even more bizarre. Every paper has developed a Web site, at a cost of millions upon millions of dollars in technology and staffing, and then gives it away for free! There's a business model Marx would love! Some publishing entities even pay to have their stuff put on the Net by giving money to AOL (NYSE:AOL - news) ! And very few ads are sold on the sites because it is more lucrative to have print ads. These companies are losing money hand-over-fist on the Net.

fnews.yahoo.com

W



To: donkeyman who wrote (3814)12/23/1998 11:32:00 AM
From: waldo  Respond to of 37507
 
Dec 23, 1998

Silicon Valley: Onsale's Emaciated Margins

By Suzanne Galante
Staff Reporter

SAN FRANCISCO -- Margins are down, competition is up and Onsale's (Nasdaq:ONSL - news) business just might be between a rock and a hard place.

Onsale was up 56% to 68 Monday on news that Yahoo! (Nasdaq:YHOO - news) would link to Onsale's auctions from its Small Business page. Despite the effect today on Onsale's stock, the deal isn't likely to keep Onsale's margins from being pressured. And that pressure could hinder its profit prospects in coming quarters.

Since 1995, when Onsale emerged as the leading online auction house, the niche of online auctions has grown into a lucrative business. Onsale and others bought refurbished and close-out computer goods from original manufacturers and resold them to the highest bidders on the Web. Even as Onsale has expanded from computers to housewares, vacations and other offerings, the space for auctioning off refurbished and close-out goods is getting cramped, with Egghead.com's (Nasdaq:EGGS - news) Surplus Direct, uBid (Nasdaq:UBID - news) , Auction Warehouse and Affiliated Computer Auction also in the space.

More competition and a limited supply of goods causes the laws of supply and demand to kick in. In addition, the manufacturers that Onsale and others buy their goods from are working to reduce their leftovers, which could further shrink the supply for the auction businesses.

"More people are competing for a slice of the pie," says Philip Leigh, an analyst at Raymond James. "It's getting more competitive to buy the merchandise. And the pie is going to shrink as PC makers take steps to construct business models that result in less inventory. [The auction companies] are being pressured from both sides."

As more companies seek out goods to sell online, the original manufacturers can charge more to rid themselves of the excess goods, says Leigh, who rates the stock accumulate. That would cut into slimming margins. His firm has no underwriting relationship with Onsale.

As a percentage of total revenue, gross margins were 13.8%, 13.3%, 11.9%, and 10.6% for the past four consecutive quarters. (These figures are based on Onsale's new method of accounting for credit card processing. Onsale moved that expense -- about 2.6% each quarter -- out of cost of goods sold and into sales and marketing).

In a recent filing, Onsale, which still derives about 80% of its revenue from the sale of computers and related goods, attributed decreasing gross margins to lower margins on purchased inventory sales. That means that Onsale's customers weren't bidding up the price on the goods enough to keep its margins flush, says company spokeswoman Stefanie Elkins. Margins were also hurt because Onsale lowered its shipping and handling rates "to be competitive with similar companies in the industry," a recent SEC filing said, adding that "the effects of this reduction on gross margins are expected to continue into future quarters."

And Onsale operates in a business that manufacturers would like to eliminate. Compaq (NYSE:CPQ - news) , for example, has shown interest in emulating Dell's (Nasdaq:DELL - news) successful direct-to-user strategy. The more PC makers take this route, the fewer products are likely to sit around in warehouses, says one hedge fund manager, who is short Onsale. That will dry up even more the pool of goods for auctions.

"Suppliers want to sell less rather than more. The goal is to sell it all [themselves] rather than sell it to Onsale," the hedge fund manager says. "There is less around and more players trying to buy."

Steven Frankel, an analyst at Adams, Harkness & Hill, who rates the stock attractive, doesn't completely buy that theory. "There will always be goods available," he says.

Onsale has taken some steps to control margins through its Quick Buy program, which offers items at fixed prices -- and gives Onsale fixed profits. Leigh says it's a desperate measure to bandage an out-of-control problem. "You don't change things," says Leigh, "unless you're dissatisfied with the way things are going."

Satisfied or not, Onsale is clearly rethinking its focus on auctions, an area that many have seen as its strongest suit. "The business model is in flux," says Frankel. "I thought they had an edge in the auction format, but they seem to be going away from that."

In addition, Onsale recently started running ads on its Web site, which should help improve margins, says Elkins. In September, the company partnered up with Yahoo to run its auction site, and Onsale gets a portion of the ad revenue from that venture, says Elkins. Other than that, the company isn't disclosing any other margin-enhancing opportunities it is considering.

Some analysts say that Onsale will start selling new goods to boost margins. But that too is a crowded space. "If they do that, then they go against a whole new breed of competitors," Frankel says. "It's a tough battle. [Selling] new goods is a very risky business change." Elkins says Onsale is always looking into ways to expand the business but says she is unaware of plans to start selling new products.

fnews.yahoo.com

W



To: donkeyman who wrote (3814)12/23/1998 11:39:00 AM
From: waldo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37507
 
Large American buying today

Canaccord long 306,000 Shares (largest US desk in Canada)
Merril Lynch long 129,000
Yorkton long 45,000

W



To: donkeyman who wrote (3814)12/23/1998 11:49:00 AM
From: Buckey  Respond to of 37507
 
dman - I know it is only a matter of sematics but In my opinion UBID went public at $30 as that was the lowest price it ever traded.

Ticekmaster IPO was $12 and it opened at $60.

JUst CRAZY is all I can say. What a ride - I am not in any anymore. Either BII is ready for an amazing upside breakout or maybe just settle back to the 2's

Other US stox doing Ok but not like this UBID