Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the gator who wrote (729)	12/23/1998 11:37:00 AM
From: R. Martenson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2390

Now we have the lowsy democrats who voted for impeachment asking the Senate to vote censure. This tells me if Hypocrite Conyur would have voted for impeachment in the house it would have passed and it would be over now. And yes there is a debate on whether the house could have voted on impeachment. Some say yes some say no IMO whoever conducts the hearings does NOT get to make the choice and it was Conyur's "lock step" kangaroos that made the difference. Now that we have balance...let me suggest over the past 200+ years there are dozens of impeachment proceedings having been processed in identically the same manner. Some were thrown out in the senate, some were impeached and simply removed ( not fined ) from office. Do we subscribe to hypocrisy now, or do we label the last 200 years of the Senate and Congress hypocritical. Cheers...my last post for today...time for some fresh thoughts from someone else.