Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (24266)	12/23/1998 2:03:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Jane Doe #5 who claims more sexual harassment 15 years ago. Yeah this is apparently very damaging. I wanted to find out more on this. I thought this was a part of the Starr report that wasnt disclosed, and that this is what swayed the remaining moderate republicans towards impeachment. I dont know if this info was obtained via Starr. If so, it looks to me like YET MORE reactionary information obtained and disclosed as a result of the undesired reaction by moderates/the public on the last set of "very damaging" dirt that Starr dug up. In other words, the argument for the details in the Starr report was always - "we have to put it all out there, otherwise the dems will accuse us of hiding something, blah blah blah, therefore we are justified in our zeal at humilating our highest office". OK so if you accept that argument, happy Starr report to you. But then, the reaction to the Starr report was ho-hum (NOT what Kenneth Starr expected), so now, we need more. Enter J.Doe #5. Why wasnt this included in the Starr report huh? Since we needed to include EVERY DETAIL. Could it be because J.Doe #5 is somehow not referencable in some way, or not credible/provable. I dont care how bad it is, if Starr was somehow involved in unleashing this J.Doe info, and yet, it wasnt in the Starr report, then I dont believe it. Michelle

To: TigerPaw who wrote (24266)	12/23/1998 2:04:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

There seems to be three stories they are holding for the Senate Proceedings. Even more Filegate, Some lady named Gracen with another sex tale, and Jane Doe #5 who claims more sexual harassment 15 years ago. Great! That should drag things for another year! Just what the doctor ordered! The Republicans aren't going to look good at all -- even if they win this one. Somebody should explain to them what "Pyrrhic Victory" means. They may hold off and try to make a deal with Larry Flynt to save some of their buds, but I doubt he cares. Yes. At some point, they will realize to their shock that Larry Flynt is... a pornographer!