Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brady B. who wrote (17196)	12/23/1998 5:36:00 PM
From: Brady B.	Respond to of 18444

Party here are the questions and some contact information. I guess thats all of them. You or whoever, can do whatever they want with them. The fax number Aleta gave is 760-564-5401 Zulu Corporate Headquarters fax number is 310-397-3602 Here is the link to other contact information from the facts and figures board: Message 6424162 ___________The Questions___________ 1) Could you name a few of the successful businesses that you claimed to have run? Are they still in business? Who may we contact to verify this information? 2) Can you explain why there are so many judgements against you in the California civil courts? 3) Is the business combination still proceeding, or is it going to be scrapped? 4) If continuing what is the status of the shareholders meeting, and the estimated date and place, etc.? 5) What is status of financing package that was being worked on, and is that in jeopardy because of events over past 2 months, including NASDQ listing problems? What are conditions to funding? 6) What cash resources do the companies have to continue operations? 7) What actual operations are Zulu or ESVS engaged in at this point, and what has been monthly revenue for past 3 months? 8) What internet-related operations exist at this time, and if the internet advertising media business has been lost or crippled, what happened to it? 9) In what jurisdiction is Rolling Rock Capital lawfully incorporated? 10) Is Rolling Rock Capital controlled, directly or indirectly, by Zulu or ESVS or by any present officer, director or controlling shareholder (ie: >10%) of Zulu or ESVS? 11) Does any present officer, director or controlling shareholder of Zulu or ESVS have any direct or indirect interest in Rolling Rock Capital? 12) Do you have a revolving front door? 13) Why does Zulu need Enhanced Services ? 14) Are you now, or have you ever been a communist? 15. How is the $35 million being paid to brandsforless.com? Cash? Stock? Where did it come from? 16. Will the effective date of the brandsforless.com acquisition be before or after the 1:10 reverse split? What IS the effective date? Why does the press release refer-to the acquisition in the past tense in the first paragraph of the PR, and as a "pending acquisition" in the last? 17. Will ZULU be merged into ESVS, as originally planned, or will ESVS be merged into ZULU? (At least the latter gets an OTCBB listing...) 18. What happens if their are changes to the capital structure of either company subsequent to the 1:10 reverse? Good Luck, bb

To: Brady B. who wrote (17196)	12/23/1998 5:43:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18444

Brady, your questions, in my opinion, some of 'em anyway, are a reach; some of 'em are very good questions. I note that several are posed negatively, rather than from a genuine inquisitive and productive nature. Thus, I recommend you place the real name of the individual who is asking a question next to the question which is asked. Think very seriously about this. If your efforts are going to be successful, you've got to realistically consider you're attempting to elicit personal information from Pat Hayton. Is he apt to provide this to an individual not named or named something like ZuluGate, ZuluLoser, I Am Not Pat Hayton or HIGHPLANESDRIFTER, etc.? I doubt it. So, if you're going to ask such brazen questions, how about putting your real identities behind them? Show some courage. Otherwise, what you're perpetuating, Brady, promulgates as nothing but a free-trashing for some. Now, I just finished transcribing a conference call for a bluechip company. There existed an operator who announced the name of each individual wanting to ask a question. Once a proper introduction was established, each participant was limited to ask two questions. The company's CEO, COO and Investor Relations Rep answered. It was a meaningful, healthy and highly interactive forum. What you are trying to do is not. Granted, a conference call concerning a bluechip company might not have the same degree of logistical support a simple Q&A might have regarding a penny stock. But still, if you expect any kind of meaningful results from your Q&A, the material must be presented in a respectful manner. Right now, it's not. Now, after reading the "proposed" questions, I have a better understanding as to why you thought I might delete some of 'em. Who wouldn't? Some are highly insulting in nature. But I would have had a back and forth with you to work on what questions should or should not be submitted. Yes, I was once willing to be a so-called "messenger," to deliver a series of questions under a cover letter with my name. But I'm not doing that now due to reasons I've described in previous posts. It remains my contention, however, that the asker of each question in order to assure quality behind the asking, should, out of respect if nothing else, provide their own name to the question. Keep working on it, Brady. Maybe you'll get it right. But the present course you're on, I assure you, will get you nowhere. How come? Well, the Spanish Inquisition ended a long time ago. NOTE TO RANDY: Randy, I know you have some legitimate questions you'd like answered. If you'd like for me to forward them I'll try and get answers for you. But you've got to identify who you are in order for me to do so on your behalf. Fair enough?