SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Demosthenes who wrote (2584)12/24/1998 4:01:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
*** Long Gone Capital Article ***

Long-Term Capital Partnership May Get
$50 Million Fee Despite a Near-Collapse

By MITCHELL PACELLE
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Just three months after the near-collapse of Long-Term Capital Management
LP, the partnership that runs the beleaguered hedge fund stands to collect
year-end "performance fees" of as much as $50 million.

The payout will be drawn from the profits made in the fund by the 14 banks
and brokerage firms that bailed it out. The exact size of the payout will
depend on the fund's value at year end, according to people familiar with the
fund. As of the end of November, the $3.625 billion invested by the bailout
banks and brokerage firms in late September had increased in value by about
$400 million, and the markets in which Long-Term Capital is active have
been relatively stable this month.

The question is whether Long-Term Capital partners
like founder John Meriwether and Nobel laureates
Myron Scholes and Robert Merton will be allowed
to pocket windfall profits so soon after their fund
nearly went bankrupt. Such payouts could trigger
criticism by those who believe the Greenwich,
Conn., fund shouldn't have been rescued in the first
place.

The consortium of investment and commercial banks
overseeing the fund -- which includes Merrill Lynch
& Co., Goldman, Sachs & Co., and the Salomon
Smith Barney unit of Citigroup -- might be reluctant
to see huge year-end paychecks going into the
pockets of the lead partners themselves. Any
payouts to the partners would have to be approved
by the consortium and a separate oversight committee composed of five bank
representatives.

"All compensation, and especially partnership compensation, has to be
approved by the full board of the consortium, upon recommendation of the
oversight committee," a Long-Term Capital spokesman said Wednesday. He
declined to comment on the likely size of the year-end fees or their uses.

The bailout agreement stipulates that the partnership that runs Long-Term
Capital is entitled to 15% of all profits on the new money, after the fund
generates a return equal to the average London Interbank Offered Rate, or
Libor, over the period in question, according to several people familiar with
the formula. Although that's lower than the 25% cut of profits the Long-Term
Capital partners used to collect, unless the fund falls in value by the end of
this month, it will still amount to roughly $50 million under the formula.

So where the fees will go is unclear at this point. Hedge funds typically use
such performance fees to pay year-end bonuses to partners and nonpartners
alike, and sometimes even to cover the portion of overhead costs not covered
by separate management fees.

Long-Term Capital, with about 140 employees spread around the world, is
regarded as a costly operation. The separate 1% annual management fee it
collects from the consortium, payable in quarterly installments in advance, did
not cover its costs this fall, which included substantial restructuring costs,
said one person close to the fund.

ays a competing hedge-fund manager who knows several of Long-Term
Capital's partners. "The outcry would be enormous."

A spokesman for the bank consortium declined to comment on the size of the
payout or what it will be used for.

The sense of crisis that engulfed the hedge fund lingered for more than a
month after the 14 banks and brokerage firms agreed to rescue it on Sept. 23.
But in November, the bond markets turned favorable, and the fund began
recording profits on the new capital.

Although longtime investors in the fund are still subject to 25% performance
fees, they won't be paying such fees this year. That's because their stakes
plunged in value by about 90% between the first of the year and the
September bailout. And Long-Term Capital's original fee agreement, like
those of most hedge funds, contains a "high-water mark." If the fund's
managers lose money, they must first recoup those losses before they can
begin collecting performance fees once again.

The fact that Mr. Meriwether and his partners, after such a catastrophic year,
could collect performance fees on money invested in September illustrates
why some other hedge fund managers who lost money during this fall's
global turmoil are attempting to raise new money. If a hedge fund, for
example, has a 50% loss, it must then gain 100% to get back to the
high-water mark and begin collecting a cut of profits. But the high-water
mark does not apply retroactively to new money that is raised.

Many hedge funds find that their annual management fees -- 1% is typical for
the industry -- barely cover their costs of doing business. So it is the
performance fees that provide fund operators with the bulk of their
compensation.

Before its near collapse, Long-Term Capital had some of the highest fees in
the industry: a 2% management fee and 25% performance fee. During the
first three years of the fund's life, when it generated annual returns of as
much as $500 million, partners collected sizable year-end fees.