Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (24469)	12/25/1998 11:08:00 AM
From: sea_biscuit	Respond to of 67261

My observation was about Dinesh D'Souza in this context.

To: Les H who wrote (24469)	12/25/1998 7:19:00 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

My take on things. Now the Senate has the ball and can do a censure thing they should run with it. Censure is like a plea bargain, you can't have a penalty without a trial or a confession. The Senate should draft a statement as to how Slick lied. No 10 minutes of lawyer talk. No preachers. No tears. A statement. He signs it and gets a censure and a $1,000,000 fine to be paid by whomever. Publish this settlement, the repubs want this over!!! When Slick waffles he will be toast.