SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics & Broadcast News Media - Nightly -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jimpit who wrote (41)12/30/1998 7:39:00 AM
From: jimpit  Respond to of 165
 
The Washington Times
washtimes.com

Inside Politics
News and political dispatches from around the nation

By Greg Pierce
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Dishonest historians



Earlier in the week, this column noted a George magazine
report that presidential adviser Sidney Blumenthal orchestrated
the "nonpartisan" ad in which more than 400 historians declared
there was no reason to consider impeachment of the president.
The ad appeared in the New York Times just days before
the November elections.
Now, the American Enterprise adds another piece to the
puzzle showing just how dishonest were the historians who
organized the statement.
The media "missed one aspect of the affair: the invaluable
assistance these 'historians speaking as historians' -- as one
organizer put it -- received from People for the American Way
(PAW), a left-wing activist group .." the American Enterprise
says in its January-February issue.
"Though the historians neglected to mention it in their ad, or
in their press releases, or at their press conference, they were
only able to publish their Times ad because PAW's tax-exempt
foundation purchased it for them and served as the receiver for
the donations that paid for it. The mailing address given in the
historians' ad is actually the Washington office of PAW, though
nobody in the major media seems to have bothered to discover
this. Somehow we suspect that if 400 non-liberal scholars took
out such an ad and listed an address that in fact belonged to, say,
the Christian Coalition, the information might come out in news
stories."
(Emphasis jimpit)

Not this time

The contradictions of late have apparently become too much
for Katha Pollitt, columnist for the Nation.
"At war? Did I miss something," Ms. Pollitt writes in the
leftist journal's Jan. 11 issue. "Sheila Jackson Lee offered thanks
to 'our American troops who are now fighting for our liberty.'
Saddam Hussein threatens our liberty? Is it too much to ask that
a member of the House recognize that a president who bombs
foreign countries without consulting Congress is the threat to
liberty she ought to be worrying about? This is the sort of
paranoid jingoism progressives can usually be counted on to
mock. Not this time: Jesse Jackson, rallying the
anti-impeachment crowd in Washington, passed over the
airstrikes entirely in favor of weepy revivalism. ... Not a peep
from the 400 historians who signed Sean Wilentz and Arthur
Schlesinger's anti-impeachment petition, with its reverential
defense of the institution of the presidency, presumably even as
embodied in some $500 million worth of airstrikes."
Ms. Pollitt suggests that the left's support for President
Clinton has been a one-way street: "Why are 'progressives'
always the ones who rally around the president without getting --
or even asking for -- anything in return?"


Looking back

Human Events, the conservative weekly, notes that 27 sitting
Democratic senators voted to remove federal District Judge
Walter Nixon back in 1989. Mr. Nixon had been impeached for
lying to a grand jury.
"My impression is that Judge Nixon is not a bad or evil
person. Instead, Judge Nixon struck me as someone who dug
himself into a hole -- and then kept digging when he realized he
was stuck," Sen. Herb Kohl, Wisconsin Democrat, said at the
time in remarks delivered on the Senate floor.
"He's probably not a liar at heart, but in my judgment, he
probably did lie in this instance."

washtimes.com