SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Diamond Offshore DO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Aggie who wrote (54)12/25/1998 12:48:00 AM
From: Aggie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 101
 
To All,

Answered my own question: Credit Suisse First Boston:

Diamond Offshore, Inc. (DO, $22.63, BUY) Target (12 Months): $35
Diamond and British Petroleum (BP, $88.25,Buy) terminated the
contract for the deepwater drillship the Ocean Clipper. The rig
has been plagued by equipment problems since delivery in mid
1997, particularly related to the BOP, and will be in the yard
for BOP repairs and other upgrades into Q299. The Clipper will be
capable of drilling in 7,500 feet of water after being repaired.
The contract with BP was to run into 2001 at a dayrate of
$114,000. 1999 earnings could decrease by approximately $0.19 per
share if no substitute work is found for the Clipper. This is an
unlikely scenario, as rigs capable of drilling in these water
depths have recently signed contracts at dayrates of $135,000 to$180,000.

We maintain our view that deepwater activity will be stronger
than shallow water activity in the current cycle. However, the
deepwater is not immune to the effects of the downturn in oil
prices. Operators are attempting to reduce spending commitments
where contractually possible.

Diamond is attractively valued, with an enterprise value of
approximately 42% of estimated replacement cost, and more than
$600 million in cash.

We are not changing our estimates as the Clipper could earn a
higher dayrate on a new contract.
Maintain Buy
Annual EPS 12/99E 1.72
12/98E 2.59

Well folks......this is the start of a particularly ugly trend, IMHO. But this particular case looks like it has something to do with (reluctantly) planned upgrade work encountering E&P budget cuts than with an expedient dismissal to get out of a contract. The rig had been working off Mississippi Canyon (GOM) in 6600' of water. Can't say that I buy CSFB's assertion that better dayrates are on the horizon.

Regards to all,

Aggie