Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: alan w who wrote (868)	12/26/1998 12:57:00 AM
From: pezz	Respond to of 2390

Alan the source for that definition came from a post by a former judge on one of these threads. "Dougin" I trust him. I have heard it before. I realize that this is no evidence so you must do your own DD on the matter if you choose to dispute it.<<This high crime and misdemeanor argument is getting old>> It may well be getting old but so am I and this does not mean that the argument or my self is in any way flawed. <<she said the President should be removed for LYING to the public. That was her interpretation of our constitution>>Look, my friend, Hillary is a politician's wife It was in her political interest to say that at the time. It was hypocritical of her to speak this way, but it doesn't change the issue. Remember Hyde made comments about lying as well during a Republican Administration. That also makes him a hypocrite . Do you think this means BC should go free? At any rate thanks for the substantial debate. It gets more unusual here every day. pez