SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: R. Martenson who wrote (871)12/26/1998 2:22:00 AM
From: pezz  Respond to of 2390
 
<< Reagan killing commies...you chose to argue the funding for it, not the statement itself.>> I argue the funding because I felt that the more important issue was that Reagan deceived the Congress and in effect tried to grab power. He may indeed have been killing other than "Commies" but this was an argument that I did not want to get in to at this time.
My discussion about the will of the people was about my changing opinion to the argument that his crimes didn't fit the impeachment definition. Thus my prattling on about the success of our system and the brilliance of our founding fathers in their setting up the rules that have stood the test of 200 years.
<<Should I 'trust' history or your opinion on how we should feel?>>
I don't recall suggesting you should in any way trust how I feel.As far as history goes are you suggesting that even if there has been an impeachment for lesser crimes that means it has been correct? Even if Clinton were convicted by the Senate on the existing evidence it would not change my mind. History proves that it happened not anything else.
pez