Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (24541)	12/26/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Michelle, res << You republicans do appear to support Starr rather strongly, dont you? :-) Do you think Starr will join the republicans this year and make a speech? >>> Michelle, I can't speak for all Republicans but yes I support Judge Starr and what his team was forced by a lying White House spin team to do. He forced them to admit to the truth. I would think most Americans would admire a prosecutor who could accomplish that. Perhaps you would have liked us to go on without discovering the truth. It may have been easier short term. Paula Jones would have lost her case without a settlement. And her sexual harassment law suit would have been discredited and laughed at by liberals. Undoubtedly you and pezz would have gone on and on about how there was no evidence to her claim. Liberals would have been happy. Of course Justice would have been made a mockery of. But I suppose that never bothered liberals before, why should it start now. :-) No, judge Starr will not be making any speeches at the Republican convention. After all it was the Democrats that asked him to be the prosecutor anyway. And although you will never see it in the 6.7 second sound bite liberal news. He is actually not a partisan Republican. Just an honest person who was asked (by Democrats) to do a job. Namely "discover the truth", and he did it. As I've said before all Judge Starr did was document behavior. If the behavior never existed, the documentation would not have painted such an ugly picture of your hero Bill. I noticed you didn't answer the questions regarding Larry Flynt. I don't blame you. :-) Michael