SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (41026)12/27/1998 1:39:00 AM
From: S. maltophilia  Respond to of 132070
 
<<Not a revolution, a media evolution>>
Maybe a devolution. A paper catalog mail order firm spends a dollar or two on printing and mailing costs for each of its catalogs, but (assuming it's well run and profitable-something the i'net operations haven't demonstrated) it exercises some care in selecting who gets these catalogs. There's been plenty of work done in developing databases of likely customers, cultivating the good ones, and jettisoning the bad ones. All the i'net firms have done is put up elaborate sites and hope for some eyeballs. Those that locate in virtual malls are spending enormous amounts for what might be advantageous locations, but without the benefit of physical stores (walk in, fondle the merchandise, hassle the help, etc.).



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (41026)12/27/1998 1:54:00 AM
From: Michael Bakunin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
..but catalog sales where mail-order houses not only get advertisers to pay for space in catalogs, but also get consumers (PC/'net costs) to share the cost of catalogs. I have spare records up on the web; loads easier than swap meets or mailing lists.

New costs (time/tech) are small, so 'net sales really are a better mousetrap for the .com brigade. A slightly better mousetrap.

mb



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (41026)12/27/1998 7:13:00 AM
From: accountclosed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB, It seems like an appropriate time for you again to comment on "Window Dressing". I have seen an enormous number of posts commenting on the "obviousness" of the fact that window dressing is what is going on now.

I don't believe in window dressing and have seen you post in the past saying you didn't either. tia.

(Perhaps with the dumbing-down of "investors" over the last year, it has become a reality <g>)