Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IFLY - travel sales on the web pure play -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JOHN CHEN who wrote (2874)	12/27/1998 12:37:00 AM
From: john david martin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4761

Mr. Chen this is not a PWAV the stock you were hyping that failed. I have almost doubled my money in IFLYW (bought at two sold at 3.5)selling part of my shares last week and still hold 4k more which I will hold until it goes over 10 probably next week. You are obviously unaware of the story here and I'm not going to bother wasting time explaining to a hypster like you. Please don't make me dredge up your sordid past. Suffice to say you can come back next week after website announcement so I can tell you how wrong you are again. Buy the way how are PTVL earnings and their P/E compared to IFLY, OH I forgot PTVL has no P/E BECAUSE they don't have any earnings. Fellow IFLYERS this guy is a real loser and has caused people to lose some serious money.

To: JOHN CHEN who wrote (2874)	12/30/1998 11:06:00 PM
From: SkyDart	Respond to of 4761

To John Chen, Tokyo and the Naysayers: Please re-read my post #2873. IFLY is a legitimate wave meant to be ridden by those who wish to profit by buying low and selling high. Its that simple. There are no mafia men hiding behind the bushes. This stock is not going to hell in a handbasket any sooner than the likes of UBID, CYCH, MALL or a slew of other momentum driven internet-related stocks. One only needs to analyze the price and technical action that is present for all to see. This should not be a partisan forum [ie the Longs against the Shorts]. It gets nauseating to read the predictable trash-talking of the shorts beating down the intelligence of the longs and vice-versa. Kind of like listening to CNBC and watching the Republicans bash Clinton while the Democrats loyally defend, yet all ignore the facts. For what its worth, I remain hedged with a combination of long warrants and short stock. I covered a good percentage of my shorts today at 10 3/8 to 11 3/8 in the belief we will see some upward movement in IFLY; especially while awaiting the release of IRIS. BTY That guy, Chris Byron who wrote "the article" has his facts all wrong and might just as well have us believe that the whole internet frenzy is being manufactured out of some Florida Boiler-room---total stupidity and sour grapes. For example, he cited that IFLY nearly tripled in a day on Monday. Sorry, but a rise from 9 to 16 hardly constitutes a tripling. If his opinions are in any way as accurate as his facts, they may be safely taken with a tiny grain of salt.... Happy trading and good luck to all, Jeff