Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SkyMall (SKYM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (176)	12/27/1998 12:08:00 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Respond to of 987

Oh, now that makes me nervous! You will be "forwarding [my statements to MASH] for legal review." Now I really cannot stop laughing, as cannot my colleagues over here watching all of this. Please do! I have always wanted to take on a firm such as MASH in court. I'm afraid my attorney would have to take the case pro bono, as he would enjoy it too much and find it far too simple to find it conscionable to accept compensation. Anthony, you claim to have been a MM. Frankly, I don't believe you. The fact is all three of you are spreading completely false and misleading information. Let's get a few things straight: 1. GSCO is generally the most powerful influence in any stock he trades, hence he is the "axe" or the "hammer" 2. Then come MLCO, SBSH and LEHM 3. A little further down the line come the boutique firms Obviously, MASH and NITE are powerful, for they represent the orders of manifold clients (daytraders and investors) behind them. But to compare them with an IB like Goldman or Merrill, whatever. You are comparing apples and oranges. We all could not stop laughing at your statement that you and your averred colleagues could defeat Merrill "in [their] sleep." I'll bet. Let's see: when the heat is on, and you are down $5,000,000, I guess you don't worry, for you have $billions in reserve, right? Your arguments are ridiculous. No boutique or small-time brokerage could ever compete with a Goldman, Merrill, Lehman or Barney - they simply don't have pockets deep enough to sustain a heavy defeat, or fade the trend in their favor in any significant manner. I repeat, comparing NITE and MASH to GSCO and MLCO...geez. We're still laughing. No matter how many times you post here, only the ignorant and gullible will swallow your transparently self-serving lies. And as for worrying about a SKYM gap down - if it happens, so be it, no one can predict stock movement with complete accuracy, especially in the Internet sector; however, my position was taken at an average of 7.85, so I'm not too concerned. As for you, my prevaricating short friends, you have far more to worry about.