To: Dnorman who wrote (2905 ) 12/27/1998 9:14:00 AM From: Haim R. Branisteanu Respond to of 99985
More interesting stories, will the market react to this??telegraph.co.uk :80/et?ac=000387808654031&rtmo=Q303QapR&atmo=99999999&P4_FOLLOW_ON=/98/12/27/wcli27.html&pg=/et/98/12/27/wcli27.html At the same time, it seems that Hillary Clinton was even more furious with the President than previously suspected. Matt Drudge, the Internet gossip writer who broke the first news of the Monica Lewinsky affair, said that she "snapped" and struck him during a White House fight on the day he was impeached. It was the First Lady who helped rally Democrats to her husband last weekend, walking with him arm in arm as he became only the second US President to be impeached. But Mr Drudge repeated claims - which he said were due to be published in the National Enquirer, a supermarket tabloid - that Mrs Clinton "lost it" and hit the President so hard that he had to be rescued by his Secret Service bodyguards. He was forced to wear make-up to conceal the bruising, according to the report. _______________________________________cgi.pathfinder.com Betrayal of whom? Web journalists, at least anecdotally, know them well: They are the Clinton hunters. At the other end of the President's gravity-defying approval numbers is a band of perhaps 25 percent of Americans who firmly believe Clinton is a career criminal who should have been impeached and removed long ago. But when the New York Times went looking for this steel-jawed minority, it also found Clinton's worst fear: a subset of those job-approval groupies that nevertheless finds the scandal -- and the President himself -- a wearisome embarrassment and wants him to resign. They may never see that day. But come February, a combination of the the virulent and the merely nauseated could provide Republicans with the coalition they've been waiting for.