Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JMD who wrote (20448)	12/27/1998 4:59:00 PM
From: Sawtooth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Hi, Mike. As you may already know, there is a thread for LWIN at: Subject 22822 I'm with you, however, in thinking there's also good enough synergy to discuss it on the Q thread, also; though the purists might object. <<I also own RMBS, LOR, GSTRF, WCII>> Sorry to hear that you're still holding that underperforming, money pit of a stock, Rambus. I mean $35 to $100 in one year; are we talkin' spinnin' wheels stuck in the mud or what? To alleviate your distress, I've set up a charitable foundation in my name to enable you to donate your shares before the close of the tax year. <ggg> (Massive capital gains are a bitch, not? Congratulations on an excellent selection and holding.)

To: JMD who wrote (20448)	12/27/1998 8:44:00 PM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Mike: Assume Ramsey is out, not short. But he can (and no doubt will) speak for himself. For myself, I consider the Q to have the best potential for a ten bagger of any stock I own (and I look for multi-baggers). But the trick in my experience with a company like the Q is patience. Gregg has put the case clearly. The hits the Q took in 1998 were both external and self inflicted, but IMO just put off the take off I see coming. Since I give priority to wireless and fiber within telecom, the Q leaps to the eye as does LOR. Both have been disappointing in market price of the stock in 1998. So what to do? To each his own, of course. Still seems to me though that the risk in both cases is greater being out than being in. Comments? Chaz