SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (24690)12/28/1998 1:52:00 AM
From: Bob Lao-Tse  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
>>He shouldn't be allowed to violate a law that you and I cannot violate. The question is, once he has violated it, how do you make the punishment fit the crime? Many Americans simply believe that though Clinton should be punished for his actions, they do not rise to the level of impeachable offenses.

I'm going to ignore the rest of your post since it has nothing to do with the issue at hand, and is a misplaced attempt at an ad hominem argument.

Read the Constitution. The fact of the matter is that if he did indeed violate the law, as it seems he did, the only "punishment" at our disposal is impeachment. And, as has been previously shouted into the void on this and other threads, impeachment was never meant to be a "punishment." It is simply a method for removing an unfit person from an important office. And (thankfully) it doesn't matter what many Americans think. It was left up to the Congress to decide if a president is unfit, and yes, they then have to potentially take the heat for that decision. That is the nature of a republic. As for "punishment" that is something that will (I fervently hope) be decided in the criminal proceedings brought against him after he's out of office. And, when it gets right down to it, that is the only really important part of this whole thing. Bill Clinton must face the same consequences that anyone else who committed the same crime would face.

Now, whether he gets kicked out of office or not is almost immaterial. I think it would establish a better (for our continued liberty) precedent to give him the boot unceremoniously and quickly, but if that is not the decision that the Senate reaches, so be it. But, either way, he must face the same charges that anyone else would face. All people must continue to be equal under the law, even Presidents.