SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Junkyardawg who wrote (4032)12/28/1998 1:16:00 AM
From: Tim Luke  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90042
 
nor would i



To: Junkyardawg who wrote (4032)12/28/1998 1:22:00 AM
From: mr.mark  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90042
 
with our surveillance, and other sources of information, it is a sure bet that we would know if that guy had the big one. that's why we keep smacking him around, to set him back and keep our foot on his neck.

i agree with those who say saddam will strike back. but he does not have a nuclear arsenal.



To: Junkyardawg who wrote (4032)12/28/1998 8:15:00 AM
From: backman  Respond to of 90042
 
of greater concern, because of the difficulty to monitor, are biological and chemical weapons.
for a gripping quasi-fictional read on current techno capabilities, check out "the cobra event" by richard preston (who also wrote one of the original books on AIDS dissemination)
a truly terrifying description of how easy it would be to disrupt a city with biological weapons. remember the nerve gas attacks in Japan's subways?
david s


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News