Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich Investor who wrote (3928)	12/28/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Kevin Hamlin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37507

Hey Guys, Would you do us all a favour and take your squabble private? Just click on the person's name, and then "send private message". That way we can get back to this being a GOOD BII thread. Much appreciated. Kevin

To: Rich Investor who wrote (3928)	12/28/1998 4:15:00 PM
From: Ruyi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37507

The only pain I have is the one in my - - - .I reached down to see and what did I find , a guy named KRIS . A good flush is what you do with such fecal matter isn't it? A good illustration of your arrogance and narrow views : "The mentality up here is entirely different than that in the U.S. and the author of this superficial article fails to take that into consideration when looking at the popularity of online shopping in Canada compared to the U.S." "If people are going to post articles written by uninformed analysts on this thread, make sure they contain information relevant to BII and the circumstances under which they operate. It isn't simply a matter of comparing gross margins, revenues, sales etc. etc." HOW is this for pompous attitude: "an academic has just as much, if not more, to contribute to this thread than people like you" !! And last but not least your ever present narcissistic streak : To: Kris H. (3906 ) From: Kris H. Sunday, Dec 27 1998 5:58PM ET Reply # of 3929 As a follow-up to my previous message, if the company feels that a roll-back is in its best interests in order to get on the NASDAQ, then I would feel compelled to support such a move for the record. I agree that it may a window of opportunity that may not present itself again, and I would sooner take a profit under this arrangement then to not take one at all. I just hope that BII doesn't have to resort to such a move to make the NASDAQ next year. This pretty well sums it all up doesn't it . "You were arguing with a lawyer Doug, you were going to lose this one anyways!" Fecal matter by any other name is still fecal matter.