To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (6349 ) 12/28/1998 10:07:00 PM From: golden_tee Read Replies (1) | Respond to
Larry and Zeev, thank you both for your replies and the civil tone is appreciated. I find Zeev's posts generally factual and earnest (even if they are not always pro-VLNC). Contrarian posts are valuable because the perspectives provide an alternate view point to my own at times. Larry, on the other hand, lately you seem to be negatively slanting everything about VLNC at every opportunity. I guess I can understand your dislike of the condescending responses, but understand the position of the still-longs. Myself and others have plenty of money in VLNC and do not appreciate any efforts to decrease the share price. Much of what is continually rehashed has been put to rest or could be with just a call to the company. I trade part of my shares regularly and have locked in profits and reentered many times. I do not, however, get on this board to spread potential negatives and doubt or discredit others during periods when I'm out of the stock or have a light position. To me it is unethical, or at the very least is a pretty selfish thing to do. Larry, I also have seen and been taken in by one internet pump-and-dump and the similarity is certainly there. However, I have followed VLNC since 1991, so their track record is well known to me. As we've all heard before, and I truly believe, "this time is different". As far as confirming FMK's earlier statement of VLNC shipping samples... I have previously spoken with one of the recipients. I agree on the general weakness of both charts, but this is common in under $10 NASDAQ stocks during the final 2 weeks of December every year. Look for them both to add $1 for no reason come the first 2 weeks of January.
