SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rupert1 who wrote (41528)12/29/1998 7:18:00 AM
From: Dr. David Gleitman  Respond to of 97611
 
Good Morning Victor:

Over the past several trading sessions, CPQ's "growth" can only be described as anemic, at best. Do you really see this puppy going to 47-50 within the next month?

David



To: rupert1 who wrote (41528)12/29/1998 8:09:00 AM
From: Elwood P. Dowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Victor... Where have you been??? OF COURSE, these threads are dangerous. I would never buy or sell a stock based on ANYTHING that ANYONE says on ANY of these threads. These threads are a good source for news releases, technical information, and "interesting" conversation. I was the biggest cheerleader for SYSF when I owned 64k+ shares, but had enough sense to kiss it goodbye and take the profit when I saw the very first sign of a crack in the armor. When I operated my own business, I lived by the following.... I ain't here to park cars, where the dollar bill begins the friendship ends, I'm here to make money not friends, nobody pays my gas & light bill but me, and only cream and bastards rise. Same applies to stocks. El



To: rupert1 who wrote (41528)12/29/1998 8:16:00 AM
From: Elwood P. Dowd  Respond to of 97611
 
Victor... btw, it wouldn't surprise me to see Jim Kelley take a long position in CPQ soon. His conduct may fit the CSCO capitulator example that you cited. El