SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (25930)12/29/1998 1:07:00 PM
From: Larry Brew  Respond to of 31646
 
JDN, << social security commissioner knowing about y2k >>
I think he knows CRAP, but he indicated to a national CNBC
audience that he does and there's plenty in that audience that
don't know squat either. He could have said: "SS is fixed", then
shut his stupid trap. Notice how the small, much needed y2k rally,
came to a screeching halt?
Larry



To: JDN who wrote (25930)12/29/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: Captain Jack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
JDN --- TAVA PR --- give the world a break, there is none. Just as if TAVA did not exist. The reason for the price difference rests strictly in mgmts lap --- All those you mentioned were excited to give them a nice option package for the kind of performance the stock has given... they say "shit runs down hill" and it has with TAVA,, but remember it always "FLOATS TO THE TOP" so put it in jjs lap where it belongs--- not on ghosts! HDIE is doing well today, up 5/s <gg>.



To: JDN who wrote (25930)12/29/1998 1:51:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
Senator Bennett: '2K: A Bump In The Road, Or A Drive Off The Cliff?
December 8, 1998

January 1, 2000 is a day that we need to look forward to
with concern, because of what has come to be known as
the millennium bug, the year 2000 problem. As the
chairman of the newly created committee dealing with this
challenge in the Senate, I am attempting to reach a national
audience on the dimensions of the problem. A lot of people
say they understand it: It is simply that computers are
geared to handle the date with two digits instead of four.
So 1998 would be in the computer as '98' instead of
'1998.' And that means when you get to the year 2000, the
'00 'to the computer means '1900' because the '19' is
assumed in advance.

Actually, it is more serious than that. There are three areas
of concern about Y2K. The first one, of course, is the
software concern that I have already mentioned. The
software is programmed with two digits for the date instead
of four. If you do not change the software program, the
computer runs into problems and starts to do very strange
things when it hits the year 2000.

Since I have been involved in this issue — and it has been
almost a year since I began to focus on it — I have
discovered there were two other areas. In addition to
software, you have a hardware problem symbolized in the
phrase 'embedded chips.' These tiny chips that drive the
computers, the miracles of the modern technological age,
very often have a date function built into them. And, again,
in order to save space on the chip, the date function is built
in with two digits.

Where are the embedded chips? They are embedded
everywhere. Andy Grove, CEO of Intel, the largest producer
of chips in the United States, testified recently in
Washington where he was asked, 'How serious is the Y2K
problem?' He said, 'It is very serious. And the reason is,
you don't know where the embedded chips are embedded.'
For example, he said, the thermostat in your home may not
work after New Year's Eve, 1999. And it won't do you any
good to call the manufacturer of the thermostat, because
the manufacturer does not know how to fix the problem. The
chips were purchased, put into the thermostat, without
concern as to whether or not they had a date function. And
if the manufacturer got some chips that had date functions
in them and put those chips into your thermostat, you are
going to be very chilly on New Year's Day in the year 2000.
And there is no way of knowing in advance whether that is
going to happen.

That can be a nuisance for you, but it can be a life-or-death
situation for some people, and it can be an enormous
manufacturing challenge where we are storing and
refrigerating meat and other perishables that are
dependent on those embedded chips. It can also be a
life-or-death situation for an automobile manufacturer
whose entire plant is now automated with robotics, all of
which have embedded chips. So it is not just the software
that needs to be changed, as the first of these three areas
of concern; it is also the embedded chips that need to be
found and dealt with '
....

y2kcertified.com