To: Bux who wrote (20520 ) 12/29/1998 2:49:00 PM From: Sawtooth Read Replies (1) | Respond to
To all: <<Tero,...I have been following your arguments for almost two years now and I used to think you had some good points. But in the last 12 hours your credibility has fallen to the point of none. You have failed to even attempt to back up your claims, instead changing the subject to talk about talk/standby times, GSM market dominance etc... How pathetic. Even newbies to this thread will not be swayed by your rhetoric. It has become increasingly clear to me that even you do not believe your own rhetoric but spew it in a pathetic attempt to keep your GSM/W-CDMA dream afloat and protect the economic prosperity your nation has been enjoying recently......It appears that I am not the only one who has given up waiting for you to fill us in on the technological innovations ERICY has provided that distinguish W-CDMA from CDMA2000.>>Someone compile a list of very specific questions from the Qcom side and let Tero answer each question, succinctly and concisely . I expect that will strip away all the fur, hide and fat, and get right down to the meat of the issues. There are three likely outcomes: 1. - no one from the Qcom side will present the compiled questions, in which case the objective would appear to be to debate and argue. 2. - Tero will answer the questions straight up; in which case the answers are clear, although maybe not agreed to. 3. - Tero will choose not to answer or will not answer clearly and succinctly; which will be obvious in the responses. In any case, further argument over the same, often repeated points will be moot.
